Litmex protocol

Litmex protocol

9g1TW...MNG18

Vote for Litmex protocol

Audit • KYC • PenTest

0 votes

No Discount Yet

0%50%100%
Social
  • Website
  • Twitter
  • Telegram

Total Score

82%Low Risk
Top 15%Percentile
#-Rank

Description

Autonomous agents trading real-world events across news, tech & culture.

Security

Score
95%
0%50%100%
Percentile
Top15%
0%50%100%
Score History

Audit

Audited by CyberScope

CyberScope Logo

Fundamentals

Score
69%
0%50%100%
Percentile
Bottom40%
0%50%100%
Score History

Timeline

Website

KYC

CyberScope KYC
NO

Maturity

Website Age
1Y
KYC Chain

Are you looking to build trust with your investors,
get listed on an exchange or raise capital?

Request KYC

Market

Score
62%
0%50%100%
Percentile
Top40%
0%50%100%
Score History

Market Stability

Market Cap
$0
Trading Volume
N/A
Price 30d
N/A
Price 60d
N/A
No price data available

Vitals

Score
35%
0%50%100%
Percentile
Bottom30%
0%50%100%
Score History

User Rating

No ratings yet. Be the first to rate Litmex protocol.

DNS

8 Passed
10 Total
  • Missing SPF record
  • Missing DMARC record
  • Missing DKIM record
  • Ineffective SPF record
  • SPF record contains a softfail without DMARC
  • Name Servers Versions exposed
  • Allow Recursive Queries
  • CNAME in NS Records
  • MX Records IPs are private
  • MX Records has Invalid Chars

Security

7 Passed
7 Total
  • Notification on start
  • Inspector issues
  • Uses HTTPS
  • Paste preventing inputs
  • Avoids deprecated APIs
  • Geolocation on start
  • Errors in console

Vitals

3 Passed
7 Total
  • Total Blocking Time
  • First Contentful Paint
  • Speed Index
  • Largest Contentful Paint
  • Cumulative Layout Shift
  • robots.txt is not valid
  • Links are crawlable

Socials

  • 936936
    TwitterTwitter Followers
  • 1212
    TelegramTelegram Members

Listed

  • Coinscope logoCoinscope
    Votes 10083

Decentralisation

Score
63%
0%50%100%
Percentile
Top30%
0%50%100%
Score History
Token Holders
N/A
Token Holders
N/A
Top 10 Wallets
N/A
Team Percentage